I can understand how even a culture that takes pride in it's own richness may be set on a course of amending their rites of law to establish the people of the country as comprised of persons in need of legislative reason. I can see two things clearly in this book. That being versed in religion is now a thought of the general collective, and how staying versed in religion can account for cancellations of oaths, since the foundations of the world is now based on economics. It is also of interest to me how new governing in countries of an autocratic government may change their puniary stance if on nothing else, than the occurrences, and experiences with fornication. In my own reasoning, I believe sexual pleasure, even in regards to the nature of the combination of pleasure with pain, are greatly in need of a change of legislation, since the individual will fall into forms of avarice. If the pleasure of copulation, is not upheld as a human act, based on the human condition.